Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning: History, Merits & Barriers

Dara Tafazoli; Niloofar Golshan

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15

| Peer-Reviewed

Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning: History, Merits & Barriers

Dara Tafazoli, Niloofar Golshan

Published in International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 2, Issue 5-1)

Received: 26 August 2014 Accepted: 29 August 2014 Published: 5 September 2014

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

With the rapid development of technology, more and more language teachers and learners are eager to use technologies such as computer and the Internet for language learning and teaching. Undoubtedly, the use of technology in education has a positive effect on the achievements of language learners, but it is a necessity to consider all aspects of this application – barriers. This paper provides an overview of the broad information regarding Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL). The focus of the review is on history, typology, phases, merits and barriers of this innovation in language teaching and learning.

Published in	International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 2, Issue 5-1) This article belongs to the Special Issue Teaching English as a Foreign/Second Language
DOI	10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15
Page(s)	32-38
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL), History, Merits, Barriers, Language Learning and Teaching

References

[1]	AbuSeileek, A.F., & Abu Sa’aleek, A.O. (2012). Computer assisted language learning: Merits and demerits. Language in India, 12 (4), 23-36.
[2]	Ahmad, K., Corbett, G., Rogers, M., & Sussex, R. (1985). Computers, language learning, and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[3]	Atkinson, R.C. (1972). Optimizing the learning of a second-language vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 96, 124-129.
[4]	Atkinson, R.C., & Wilson, H.A. (1969). Computer-assisted instruction. In R.C. Atkinson & H.A. Wilson (Eds.), Computer-assisted instruction: A book of readings (pp.3-14). New York: Academic Press.
[5]	Bax, S. (2003). CALL - past, present and future. System, 31 (1), 13-28.
[6]	Bax, S. (2011). Normalisation revisited: the effective use of technology in language education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1 (2), 1-15.
[7]	Bax, S., & Chambers, A. (2006). Making CALL work: towards normalization. System, 34 (4), 465-479.
[8]	Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers and Education, 39, 395-414.
[9]	Beggs, T. A. (2000). Influences and barriers to the adoption of instructional technology. Presented paper at the Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference. Murfreesboro, TN.
[10]	Boyle, T.A., Smith, W.F., & Eckert, R.G. (1976). Computer-mediated testing: A branched program achievement test. Modern Language Journal, 60, 428-440.
[11]	Braul, B. (2006). ESL teacher perceptions and attitudes toward using computer-assisted language learning (CALL): Recommendations for effective CALL practice. Unpublished MA Thesis, Department of Secondary Education, Edmonton, Alberta.
[12]	Brumfit, C., Phillips, M., & Skehan, P. (1986). Computers in English language teaching. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
[13]	Cabrini Simões, L. (2007). An overview on the use of new technologies in English language teaching. Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences, 29(1), 31-34. Retrieved online from http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3073/307324783004.pdf
[14]	Cameron, K., Dodd, W.S., & Rahtz, S.P.Q. (Eds.) (1986). Computers and modern language studies. Sussex & New York: E. Horwood.
[15]	Chapelle, C.A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[16]	Chirimbu, C.S., & Tafazoli, D. (2013). Technology & media: Applications in language classrooms (TEFL, TESL & TEOL). Professional Communication & Translation Studies, 6 (1/2), 187-194.
[17]	Coghlan, B. F. (2004). Addressing the barriers to technology interaction: A case study of a rural school. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Mississippi State University, Mississippi.
[18]	Collett, M.J. (1980). Examples of applications of computers to modern language study 1: the step-wise development of programs in reading, grammar, and vocabulary. System, 8, 195-204.
[19]	Corrêa, D.M. (2001). New technologies in teaching and learning English. In: M.B.M. Fortkamp & R.P. Xavier (Eds.), EFL Teaching and learning in Brazil: theory and practice. (pp. 211-222). Florianópolis: Insular.
[20]	Davies, G. (1985). Using computers in language learning: A teacher’s guide (2nd ed.). London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
[21]	Davies, G., & Higgins, J. (1982). Computers, language and language learning. London: CILT.
[22]	Dawes, L. (2001) What stops teachers using new technology? In M. Leask (Ed.), Issues in Teaching using ICT. Routledge, London.
[23]	Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DEECD). (2010). Teaching and learning with Web 2.0 technologies. State of Victoria. Retrieved online form http://www.education.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/teachlearn/innovation/technology/web2report.pd
[24]	Dina, A-T., & Ciornei, S-I. (2013). The advantages and disadvantages of computer assisted language learning and teaching for foreign languages. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 248 – 252.
[25]	Dunkel, P. (1990). Implications of the CAI effectiveness research for limited English proficient learners. Computers in the Schools, 7(1/2), 31-52.
[26]	Fang, X., & Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and curricular reform in China: A case study. TESOL Quarterly,38 (2), 301-321.
[27]	Galavis, B. (1998). Computers and the EFL class: Their advantages and a possible outcome, the autonomous learner. English Teaching Forum, 36 (4) Retrieved online from http://exchanges.state.gov/forum/vols/vol36/no4/index.htm
[28]	Gillespie, H. (2006). Unlocking learning and teaching with ICT: Identifying and overcoming barriers. London: David Fulton.
[29]	Gips, A., Di Mattia, P., & Gips, J. (2004). The effect of assistive technology on educational costs: Two case studies. In K. Miesenberger, J. Klaus, W. Zagler, & D. Burger (Eds.), Computers Helping People with Special Needs (pp. 20-213). Springer.
[30]	Gündüz, N. (2005). Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL). Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(2), 193-214. Retrieved online from http://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/16/18.
[31]	Hainline, D. (1987). New developments in computer-assisted language learning. London & New York: Crown Helm.
[32]	Han, W. (2009). Benefits and barriers of computer assisted language learning and teaching. US-China Foreign Language, 6 (9), 40-43.
[33]	Hart, R.S. (1981). Language study and the PLATO system. Studies in Language Learning, 3, 1-24.
[34]	Hendricks, H., Bennion, J.L., & Larson, J. (1983). Technology and language learning at BYU. CALICO Journal 1, 23-27.
[35]	Higgins, J., & Johns, T. (1984). Computers in language learning, London: Collins.
[36]	Hodas, S. (1993). Technology refusal and the organizational culture of schools. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 1(10). Retrieved online from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v1n10.html
[37]	Hope, G.R., Taylor, H.F., & Pusack, J.P. (1984). Using computers in teaching foreign languages. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
[38]	Ismail, A., & Almekhlafi, A. G. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of the use of technology in teaching languages in United Arab Emirates’ schools. International Journal for Research in Education, 27, 37-56.
[39]	Jacobsen, D. M., & Lock, J. V. (2005). Technology and teacher education for a knowledge era: Mentoring for student futures, not our past. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 75-87.
[40]	Jones, C., & Fortescue, S. (1987). Using computers in the language classroom. London: Longman.
[41]	Kenning, M.J., & Kenning, M.-M. (1983). Introduction to computer-assisted language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[42]	King, K. P. (2003). Keeping pace with technology: Educational technology that transforms – The challenge and promise for higher education faculty. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ.
[43]	Lai, C. C., & Kritsonis, W. A. (2006). The advantages and disadvantages of computer technology in second language acquisition. Doctoral Forum. 3(1), 1-6.
[44]	Last, R.W. (1984). Language teaching and the microcomputer. Oxford: Blackwell.
[45]	Lee, K-W. (2000). English teacher’s barrier to the use of computer-assisted language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, VI (12). Retrieved online from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html
[46]	Leech, G., & Candlin, C. (Eds.) (1986). Computers in language teaching and research. London: Longman.
[47]	Levy, M. (1997). CALL: context and conceptualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[48]	McGrail, E. (2005). Teachers, technology, and change: English teachers' perspectives. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 5-14.
[49]	Murphy, C. (2006). The impact of ICT on primary science. In P. Warwick, E. Wilson & M. Winterbottom (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Primary Science with ICT, Open University Press, Berkshire, England.
[50]	Ozerol, G. (2009). Perceptions of EFL primary school teachers towards CALL. Unpublished MA thesis, Cukurova University, Turkey.
[51]	Paramaskas, D.M. (1983). Courseware-software interfaces: Some designs and some problems. CALICO Journal, 1 (3), 4-6.
[52]	Plana, M. G. & Ballester, E. P. (2009). Beyond technology in computer assisted language learning: Learners‘ experiences. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 3-12.
[53]	Riasati, M.J., Allahyar, N., & Tan, K-E. (2012). Technology in language education: Benefits and barriers. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(5), 25-30.
[54]	Romano, M. T. (2003). Empowering teachers with technology: Making it happen. Scarecrow Press, Oxford.
[55]	Saeedi, Z. (2013). Care with CALL. In: D. Tafazoli & S.C. Chirimbu (Eds.), Language & Technology: Computer Assisted Language Learning (pp. 40-47). Tehran, Iran: Khate Sefid Press.
[56]	Saettler, P. (1990). The evolution of American educational technology. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
[57]	Shyamlee, S.D. & Phil, M. (2012). Use of technology in English language teaching and learning: An analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture, Singapore, 150-156.
[58]	Singhal, M. (1997). The internet and foreign language education: Benefits and challenges. The Internet TESL Journal, III (6). Retrieved online from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Singhal-Internet.html
[59]	Taylor, M.B., & Perez, L.M. (1989). Something to do on a Monday. La Jolla, CA: Athelstan.
[60]	Taylor, R. (1980). The computer in the school: tutor, tool, tutee. New York: Teachers College Press.
[61]	Underwood, J. (1984). Linguistics, computers, and the language teacher. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
[62]	Wang, S. (2012). The exploration of the advantages and disadvantages of network English teaching. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education Technology and Management Engineering, 154-158.
[63]	Wang X-T. (2006). Benefits and Drawbacks of Computer Assisted Language Teaching. US-China Foreign Language,4 (5), 59-64.
[64]	Warschauer, M. (1995). E-mail for English Teaching. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications.
[65]	Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3-20). Tokyo: Logos International. Retrieved online from http://www.ict4lt.org/en/warschauer.htm
[66]	Warschauer, M. (2000). CALL for the 21st Century. Presented paper at the IATEFL and ESADE Conference, July 2000, Barcelona, Spain.
[67]	Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(1), 57-71. Retrieved online from http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam031/2001269254.pdf
[68]	Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (Eds.). (2000). Network-Based Language Teaching: Concepts And Practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
[69]	Warschauer, M., & Meskill, C. (2000). Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning. In J. Rosenthal (Ed), Handbook of Undergraduate Second Language Education, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[70]	Warschauer, M., & Whittaker, P.F. (1997). The Internet for English Teaching: Guidelines for Teachers. The Internet TESL Journal, III (10). Retrieved online from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Warschauer-Internet.html.
[71]	Wyatt, D. (1984). Computers and ESL. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Dara Tafazoli, Niloofar Golshan. (2014). Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning: History, Merits & Barriers. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(5-1), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Dara Tafazoli; Niloofar Golshan. Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning: History, Merits & Barriers. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2014, 2(5-1), 32-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Dara Tafazoli, Niloofar Golshan. Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning: History, Merits & Barriers. Int J Lang Linguist. 2014;2(5-1):32-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15,
  author = {Dara Tafazoli and Niloofar Golshan},
  title = {Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning: History, Merits & Barriers},
  journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
  volume = {2},
  number = {5-1},
  pages = {32-38},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.s.2014020501.15},
  abstract = {With the rapid development of technology, more and more language teachers and learners are eager to use technologies such as computer and the Internet for language learning and teaching. Undoubtedly, the use of technology in education has a positive effect on the achievements of language learners, but it is a necessity to consider all aspects of this application – barriers. This paper provides an overview of the broad information regarding Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL). The focus of the review is on history, typology, phases, merits and barriers of this innovation in language teaching and learning.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning: History, Merits & Barriers
AU  - Dara Tafazoli
AU  - Niloofar Golshan
Y1  - 2014/09/05
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15
T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
SP  - 32
EP  - 38
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0221
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15
AB  - With the rapid development of technology, more and more language teachers and learners are eager to use technologies such as computer and the Internet for language learning and teaching. Undoubtedly, the use of technology in education has a positive effect on the achievements of language learners, but it is a necessity to consider all aspects of this application – barriers. This paper provides an overview of the broad information regarding Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL). The focus of the review is on history, typology, phases, merits and barriers of this innovation in language teaching and learning.
VL  - 2
IS  - 5-1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Dara Tafazoli

Science & Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran
Niloofar Golshan

Science & Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Dara Tafazoli, Niloofar Golshan. (2014). Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning: History, Merits & Barriers. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(5-1), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Dara Tafazoli; Niloofar Golshan. Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning: History, Merits & Barriers. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2014, 2(5-1), 32-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Dara Tafazoli, Niloofar Golshan. Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning: History, Merits & Barriers. Int J Lang Linguist. 2014;2(5-1):32-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15,
  author = {Dara Tafazoli and Niloofar Golshan},
  title = {Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning: History, Merits & Barriers},
  journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
  volume = {2},
  number = {5-1},
  pages = {32-38},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.s.2014020501.15},
  abstract = {With the rapid development of technology, more and more language teachers and learners are eager to use technologies such as computer and the Internet for language learning and teaching. Undoubtedly, the use of technology in education has a positive effect on the achievements of language learners, but it is a necessity to consider all aspects of this application – barriers. This paper provides an overview of the broad information regarding Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL). The focus of the review is on history, typology, phases, merits and barriers of this innovation in language teaching and learning.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning: History, Merits & Barriers
AU  - Dara Tafazoli
AU  - Niloofar Golshan
Y1  - 2014/09/05
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15
T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
SP  - 32
EP  - 38
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0221
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.15
AB  - With the rapid development of technology, more and more language teachers and learners are eager to use technologies such as computer and the Internet for language learning and teaching. Undoubtedly, the use of technology in education has a positive effect on the achievements of language learners, but it is a necessity to consider all aspects of this application – barriers. This paper provides an overview of the broad information regarding Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL). The focus of the review is on history, typology, phases, merits and barriers of this innovation in language teaching and learning.
VL  - 2
IS  - 5-1
ER  -

Copy | Download