Aims: To investigate the effect of pelvic belt on relieving antenatal symphyseal pain. Study design: A randomized clinical controlled trial. Place and Duration of study: Department of Obstetrics, Kafelsheikh general hospital - Kafelsheikh, between June 2014 and September 2014. Methodology: Twenty pregnant women (age range 25-30 years) at 24 weeks gestation with a good general health were selected randomly, clinically diagnosed with symphyeal pain and divided into 2 equal groups (A&B). Patients in group A were treated by pelvic belt with tensile force of 50 N. for 4 weeks, patients in group B without any treatment. Severity of symphyseal pain and diastasis were measured by mean of a 100-mm horizontal visual analogue scale and ultrasound before and after the treatment program. Results: Patients in group A showed non significant difference in severity of symphyseal pain and diastasis (P=0.54 & 0.84 respectively). Patients in group B showed highly significant increase in severity of symphyseal pain and diastasis (P=0.001). There were highly significant difference between both groups (P=0.001) after the treatment program. The symphyseal pain value was significantly correlated with the decrease in symphyseal diastasis.(Pearson’s correlation coefficient 0.59, P=0.005). Conclusion: Application of a pelvic belt at the symphysis pubis decrease antenatal symphyseal diastasis and pain.
Published in | European Journal of Preventive Medicine (Volume 2, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ejpm.20140206.12 |
Page(s) | 90-94 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Pregnancy, Symphyseal Pain, Tensile Force, Pelvic Belt
[1] | Becker, I., Woodley, S. J. and Stringer, M. "The adult human pubic symphysis: a systematic review". Journal of Anatomy. 217(5):475-87(2010). |
[2] | Rodrigo, C. and Renato, P."Nutrition pathways to the symphysis pubis". Journal of Anatomy. 204(3), 209–215, 2004. |
[3] | Gamble, J. and Simmons, S. "The Symphysis Pubis: Anatomic and Pathologic Considerations". Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.203, 261-272,1986. |
[4] | Kelly, O., Anne, P. and Gerald, M."Pubic symphysis separation". Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review 13, 141-155, 2002. |
[5] | Panditrao, S. , Eknathrao, B. , Popat, G. and Ramkrishna, M. ,"Pubic Symphysial Diastasis During Normal Vaginal Delivery", Journal of Obste India. 55 (4),365-366, 2005. |
[6] | Scicluna, J., Alderson, J., Webster, V. and Whiting, P. "Epidural analgesia for acute symphysis pubis dysfunction in the second trimester". International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesiology. 13(1),50-2, 2004. |
[7] | Wu, W. H., Meijer , O. G., Uegaki, K., Mens, J. M. A., van Dieën, J. H., Wuisman, P. I. J. M. and Östgaard. H. C. "Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence". European Spine Journal. 13( 7 ), 2004. |
[8] | Vleeming ,A., Albert ,H. and Ostgaared, H., “European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain”. Eur. Spine. J.17,794-819, 2008. |
[9] | Wellock, K. and Cricbton, A., “Understanding pregnant women experience of symphysis pubis dysfunction: the effect of pain”. Evidence based midwifery. 5(2),40-46, 2007. |
[10] | Leadbetter, R., Mawerd, D. and Lindow, S., “Symphysis pubis dysfunction: a review of the literature”. The Journal of Maternal–Fetal and Neonatal Medicine.16,349–354,2004. |
[11] | Okkafor, U. and Sokunbi, T.,” Physiotherapy Management of Sub-acute Postpartum Diastasis of Pubic Symphysis A case report”. Journal of the Nigeria society of physiotherapy.17,37-40, 2009. |
[12] | Khorashadi, L., Petscavage, J. and Richardson, M., “Postpartum symphysis pubis diastasis” . Radiological Case Reports. 6(3), 2011. |
[13] | Bjourklund, K., Bergstrom, S. and Nordostrom, M., “Symphyseal distension in relation to serum relaxin levels and pelvic pain in pregnancy”.Acta.Obstet.Gynecol.Scand.79(4),269-275, 2000. |
[14] | Dunbar, R.,“Puerperal diastasis of the public symphysis”. A case report.J.Reprod.Med.47,581-3, 2002. |
[15] | Berg, G., Hammar, M., Mo¨ller-Nielsen, J., Linde´n, U. and Thorblad, J., “Low back pain during pregnancy”. Obstet. Gynecol. 71,71–75,1988. |
[16] | Mens, J.M.A., Vleeming, A., Stoeckart, R., Stam, H.J. and Snijders, C.J., “Understanding peripartum pelvic pain. Implications of a patient survey”. Spine 21,1363–1370, 1996. |
[17] | O¨stgaard, H.C., Zetherstro¨m, G., Roos-Hansen, E. and Svanberg, B., “Reduction of back and posterior pelvic pain in pregnancy”. Spine 19, 894–900,1994. |
[18] | Richordson, C., Snijders, C., Hides, J. and Damen, l. "The relation between the transverse abdominis muscles, sacroiliac joint mechanics, and low back pain", Spine.27,399-405,2002. |
[19] | Snijders, C.J., Vleeming, A. and Stoeckart, R., “Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs. Part I: biomechanics of self-bracing of the sacroiliac joints and significance for treatment and exercise”. Clin. Biomech. 8, 285–294,1993a. |
[20] | Snijders, C.J., Vleeming, A. and Stoeckart, R., “Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs. Part 2: loading of the sacroiliac joints when lifting in a stooped posture”. Clin. Biomech. 8, 295–301,1993b. |
[21] | Piantadosi,s. “Clinical trial: a methodologic perspective. John wily& sons, new York. 1997. |
[22] | Collins, S.L., Moore, R.A. and McQuay, H.J. “The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimeters?”. Pain. 72, 95–97,1997. |
[23] | Damen, L., Spoor, C.W., Snijders, C.J.and Stam, H.J. “Does a pelvic belt influence sacroiliac joint stiffness?:. Clin. Biomech. 17,495–498, 2002. |
[24] | Mens, J.M., Vleeming, A., Snijders, C.J., Stam, H.J.and Ginai, A.Z. “The active straight leg raising test and mobility of the pelvic joints”. Eur. Spine J. 8, 468–473,1999. |
[25] | Ho, S., Yu, w., Lae, T. and Chow, D. "Effectiveness of maternity support belts in reducing low back pain during pregnancy :A Review ". Journal of clinical nursing.18(11),1523-1532,2008. |
[26] | Lee, y. and Chein, C. "Lumbar vertebral angles and back muscle loading with belts", Industrial Health,37,390-397,1999. |
[27] | Mens, J., Damen, L., Snijders ,C. and Stam, S. "The mechanical effect of a pelvic belt in patients with pregnancy related pelvic pain", Clinical biomechanics. 21.122-127,2006. |
APA Style
Fayiz El-Shamy, Magda Morsy, Anees Saleh. (2014). Tensile Force Effect of Pelvic Belt in Patients with Antenatal Symphyseal Pain. European Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2(6), 90-94. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejpm.20140206.12
ACS Style
Fayiz El-Shamy; Magda Morsy; Anees Saleh. Tensile Force Effect of Pelvic Belt in Patients with Antenatal Symphyseal Pain. Eur. J. Prev. Med. 2014, 2(6), 90-94. doi: 10.11648/j.ejpm.20140206.12
AMA Style
Fayiz El-Shamy, Magda Morsy, Anees Saleh. Tensile Force Effect of Pelvic Belt in Patients with Antenatal Symphyseal Pain. Eur J Prev Med. 2014;2(6):90-94. doi: 10.11648/j.ejpm.20140206.12
@article{10.11648/j.ejpm.20140206.12, author = {Fayiz El-Shamy and Magda Morsy and Anees Saleh}, title = {Tensile Force Effect of Pelvic Belt in Patients with Antenatal Symphyseal Pain}, journal = {European Journal of Preventive Medicine}, volume = {2}, number = {6}, pages = {90-94}, doi = {10.11648/j.ejpm.20140206.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejpm.20140206.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ejpm.20140206.12}, abstract = {Aims: To investigate the effect of pelvic belt on relieving antenatal symphyseal pain. Study design: A randomized clinical controlled trial. Place and Duration of study: Department of Obstetrics, Kafelsheikh general hospital - Kafelsheikh, between June 2014 and September 2014. Methodology: Twenty pregnant women (age range 25-30 years) at 24 weeks gestation with a good general health were selected randomly, clinically diagnosed with symphyeal pain and divided into 2 equal groups (A&B). Patients in group A were treated by pelvic belt with tensile force of 50 N. for 4 weeks, patients in group B without any treatment. Severity of symphyseal pain and diastasis were measured by mean of a 100-mm horizontal visual analogue scale and ultrasound before and after the treatment program. Results: Patients in group A showed non significant difference in severity of symphyseal pain and diastasis (P=0.54 & 0.84 respectively). Patients in group B showed highly significant increase in severity of symphyseal pain and diastasis (P=0.001). There were highly significant difference between both groups (P=0.001) after the treatment program. The symphyseal pain value was significantly correlated with the decrease in symphyseal diastasis.(Pearson’s correlation coefficient 0.59, P=0.005). Conclusion: Application of a pelvic belt at the symphysis pubis decrease antenatal symphyseal diastasis and pain.}, year = {2014} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Tensile Force Effect of Pelvic Belt in Patients with Antenatal Symphyseal Pain AU - Fayiz El-Shamy AU - Magda Morsy AU - Anees Saleh Y1 - 2014/10/30 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejpm.20140206.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ejpm.20140206.12 T2 - European Journal of Preventive Medicine JF - European Journal of Preventive Medicine JO - European Journal of Preventive Medicine SP - 90 EP - 94 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8230 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejpm.20140206.12 AB - Aims: To investigate the effect of pelvic belt on relieving antenatal symphyseal pain. Study design: A randomized clinical controlled trial. Place and Duration of study: Department of Obstetrics, Kafelsheikh general hospital - Kafelsheikh, between June 2014 and September 2014. Methodology: Twenty pregnant women (age range 25-30 years) at 24 weeks gestation with a good general health were selected randomly, clinically diagnosed with symphyeal pain and divided into 2 equal groups (A&B). Patients in group A were treated by pelvic belt with tensile force of 50 N. for 4 weeks, patients in group B without any treatment. Severity of symphyseal pain and diastasis were measured by mean of a 100-mm horizontal visual analogue scale and ultrasound before and after the treatment program. Results: Patients in group A showed non significant difference in severity of symphyseal pain and diastasis (P=0.54 & 0.84 respectively). Patients in group B showed highly significant increase in severity of symphyseal pain and diastasis (P=0.001). There were highly significant difference between both groups (P=0.001) after the treatment program. The symphyseal pain value was significantly correlated with the decrease in symphyseal diastasis.(Pearson’s correlation coefficient 0.59, P=0.005). Conclusion: Application of a pelvic belt at the symphysis pubis decrease antenatal symphyseal diastasis and pain. VL - 2 IS - 6 ER -