| Peer-Reviewed

Research Progress of Space Navigation Capability Based on Image Technology

Received: 27 November 2022     Accepted: 13 December 2022     Published: 23 December 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Spatial navigation ability refers to the complex process of the human body building cognitive maps in the brain according to the external environment. It is crucial to study spatial navigation ability to understand human cognitive functions. With the advent of advanced neuroimaging technologies, such as positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, more and more evidence indicates that differences in the navigation ability of empty individuals are related to differences in brain structure and function. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DTI) are two common methods of functional imaging and structural imaging. fMRI mimics animal experiments by measuring changes in signals related to blood oxygen levels in different regions of the brain, solving a major problem in human studies. On the other hand, structural connections are stable for short periods and are more suitable for studying differences in a single spatial navigation network without uniform training. Structural networks can be evaluated by DTI. DTI is highly sensitive to the Brownian motion of water molecules in voxels, especially in white matter. DTI results suggested that etiology is associated with disrupted fiber connections and decreased FA values, both of which occur in the prefrontal and prefrontal lobe-motor pathways. As far as we know, there is no systematic review of neuroimaging technologies related to spatial navigation functions. In order to fill this gap, in this review, we combine the structure and function of brain imaging and multimodal imaging technology and summarize the central brain regions and brain imaging features related to spatial navigation function. It provides a new method for selecting and dialing the spatial navigation ability of specific populations and a new idea for diagnosing clinical spatial navigation dysfunction.

Published in Clinical Medicine Research (Volume 11, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.cmr.20221106.15
Page(s) 178-182
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Spatial Navigation, sMRI, DTI, fMRI, Multimodal Brain Graph Network

References
[1] Maria Luisa Rusconi, Giulia Fusi, Crepaldi M. Spatial Navigation [J]. Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience, 2022, Volume 2 (2nd edition): 553-560.
[2] Wolbers T, Hegarty M. What determines our navigational abilities? [J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2010, 14 (3): 138-146.
[3] Rusconi M L, Fusi G, Stampatori C, et al. Developmental Topographical Disorientation With Concurrent Face Recognition Deficit: A Case Report [J]. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2021, 12.
[4] He Q, Brown T I. Heterogeneous correlations between hippocampus volume and cognitive map accuracy among healthy young adults [J]. Cortex, 2020, 124: 167-175.
[5] Liu L, Wang Y, Wang Y, et al. An enhanced multi-modal brain graph network for classifying neuropsychiatric disorders [J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2022, 81: 102550.
[6] Chrastil E R, Sherrill K R, Aselcioglu I, et al. Individual Differences in Human Path Integration Abilities Correlate with Gray Matter Volume in Retrosplenial Cortex, Hippocampus, and Medial Prefrontal Cortex [J]. eNeuro, 2017, 4 (2): 316-346.
[7] Clark I A, Monk A M, Hotchin V, et al. Does hippocampal volume explain performance differences on hippocampal-dependant tasks? [J]. NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2020, 221: 117211.
[8] Maguire E A, Gadian D G, Johnsrude I S, et al. Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2000, 97 (8): 4398-4403.
[9] Sherrill K R, Chrastil E R, Aselcioglu I, et al. Structural Differences in Hippocampal and Entorhinal Gray Matter Volume Support Individual Differences in First Person Navigational Ability [J]. Neuroscience, 2018, 380: 123-131.
[10] Weisberg S M, Newcombe N S, Chatterjee A. Everyday taxi drivers: Do better navigators have larger hippocampi? [J]. Cortex, 2019, 115: 280-293.
[11] Hasan K M, Mwangi B, Cao B, et al. Entorhinal Cortex Thickness across the Human Lifespan [J]. Journal of Neuroimaging, 2016, 26 (3): 278-282.
[12] Karakasis P A, Liavas A P, Sidiropoulos N D, et al. Multisubject Task-Related fMRI Data Processing via a Two-Stage Generalized Canonical Correlation Analysis [J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2022, 31: 4011-4022.
[13] Sulpizio V, Boccia M, Guariglia C, et al. Functional connectivity between posterior hippocampus and retrosplenial complex predicts individual differences in navigational ability [J]. Hippocampus, 2016, 26 (7): 841-847.
[14] Kravitz D J, Saleem K S, Baker C I, et al. A new neural framework for visuospatial processing [J]. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2011, 12 (4): 217-230.
[15] Focus on spatial cognition [J]. Nature Neuroscience, 2017, 20 (11): 1431.
[16] Auger S D, Mullally S L, Maguire E A. Retrosplenial cortex codes for permanent landmarks [J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7 (8): e43620.
[17] Auger S D, Maguire E A. Assessing the mechanism of response in the retrosplenial cortex of good and poor navigators [J]. Cortex, 2013, 49 (10): 2904-2913.
[18] Sulpizio V, Boccia M, Guariglia C, et al. Neural Codes for One's Own Position and Direction in a Real-World "Vista" Environment [J]. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2018, 12: 167.
[19] Banker S M, Ramphal B, Pagliaccio D, et al. Spatial Network Connectivity and Spatial Reasoning Ability in Children with Nonverbal Learning Disability [J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10 (1).
[20] Murias K, Slone E, Tariq S, et al. Development of spatial orientation skills: an fMRI study [J]. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 2019, 13 (6): 1590-1601.
[21] Arnold A E G F, Protzner A B, Bray S, et al. Neural Network Configuration and Efficiency Underlies Individual Differences in Spatial Orientation Ability [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2014, 26 (2): 380-394.
[22] Javadi A, Patai E Z, Marin-Garcia E, et al. Prefrontal Dynamics Associated with Efficient Detours and Shortcuts: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetoencenphalography Study [J]. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2019, 31 (8): 1227-1247.
[23] Ohnishi T, Matsuda H, Hirakata M, et al. Navigation ability dependent neural activation in the human brain: An fMRI study [J]. Neuroscience Research, 2006, 55 (4): 361-369.
[24] Watson T C, Obiang P, Torres-Herraez A, et al. Anatomical and physiological foundations of cerebello-hippocampal interaction [J]. Elife, 2019, 8.
[25] Benner T, Wang R, Wedeen J V. Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brain [J]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, 4: 316-329.
[26] Little G, Beaulieu C. Automated cerebral cortex segmentation based solely on diffusion tensor imaging for investigating cortical anisotropy [J]. NeuroImage, 2021, 237: 118105.
[27] den Heijer T, der Lijn F V, Vernooij M W, et al. Structural and diffusion MRI measures of the hippocampus and memory performance [J]. NeuroImage, 2012, 63 (4): 1782-1789.
[28] Wandell B A. Clarifying Human White Matter [J]. Annual review of neuroscience, 2016, 39 (1): 103-128.
[29] Iaria G, Lanyon L J, Fox C J, et al. Navigational skills correlate with hippocampal fractional anisotropy in humans [J]. Hippocampus, 2008, 18 (4): 335-339.
[30] Chou K, Cheng Y, Chen I, et al. Sex-linked white matter microstructure of the social and analytic brain [J]. NeuroImage, 2011, 54 (1): 725-733.
[31] Sex Differences in the Brain: from Genes to Behavior [J]. Oxford university press, 2007.
[32] Ramanoël S, York E, Le Petit M, et al. Age-Related Differences in Functional and Structural Connectivity in the Spatial Navigation Brain Network [J]. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 2019, 13.
[33] Hao X, Huang Y, Li X, et al. Structural and functional neural correlates of spatial navigation: a combined voxel-based morphometry and functional connectivity study [J]. Brain and Behavior, 2016, 6 (12).
[34] Fujita K, Eidelberg D. Imbalance of the direct and indirect pathways in focal dystonia: a balanced view [J]. Brain, 2017, 140 (12): 3075-3077.
[35] BENNETT I J, RYPMA B. Advances in functional neuroanatomy: A review of combined DTI and fMRI studies in healthy younger and older adults [J]. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2013, 37 (7): 1201-1210.
[36] Hahn A, Lanzenberger R, Kasper S. Making Sense of Connectivity [J]. The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2019, 22 (3): 194-207.
[37] Kong X, Wang X, Pu Y, et al. Human navigation network: the intrinsic functional organization and behavioral relevance [J]. Brain Structure and Function, 2017, 222 (2): 749-764.
[38] Zhu D, Zhang T, Jiang X, et al. Fusing DTI and fMRI data: A survey of methods and applications [J]. NeuroImage, 2014, 102: 184-191.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Huihui Wang, Linjing Zhang, Liyi Chi, Yanhai Zhang, Linli Chang, et al. (2022). Research Progress of Space Navigation Capability Based on Image Technology. Clinical Medicine Research, 11(6), 178-182. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20221106.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Huihui Wang; Linjing Zhang; Liyi Chi; Yanhai Zhang; Linli Chang, et al. Research Progress of Space Navigation Capability Based on Image Technology. Clin. Med. Res. 2022, 11(6), 178-182. doi: 10.11648/j.cmr.20221106.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Huihui Wang, Linjing Zhang, Liyi Chi, Yanhai Zhang, Linli Chang, et al. Research Progress of Space Navigation Capability Based on Image Technology. Clin Med Res. 2022;11(6):178-182. doi: 10.11648/j.cmr.20221106.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.cmr.20221106.15,
      author = {Huihui Wang and Linjing Zhang and Liyi Chi and Yanhai Zhang and Linli Chang and Wanqi Bai},
      title = {Research Progress of Space Navigation Capability Based on Image Technology},
      journal = {Clinical Medicine Research},
      volume = {11},
      number = {6},
      pages = {178-182},
      doi = {10.11648/j.cmr.20221106.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20221106.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cmr.20221106.15},
      abstract = {Spatial navigation ability refers to the complex process of the human body building cognitive maps in the brain according to the external environment. It is crucial to study spatial navigation ability to understand human cognitive functions. With the advent of advanced neuroimaging technologies, such as positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, more and more evidence indicates that differences in the navigation ability of empty individuals are related to differences in brain structure and function. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DTI) are two common methods of functional imaging and structural imaging. fMRI mimics animal experiments by measuring changes in signals related to blood oxygen levels in different regions of the brain, solving a major problem in human studies. On the other hand, structural connections are stable for short periods and are more suitable for studying differences in a single spatial navigation network without uniform training. Structural networks can be evaluated by DTI. DTI is highly sensitive to the Brownian motion of water molecules in voxels, especially in white matter. DTI results suggested that etiology is associated with disrupted fiber connections and decreased FA values, both of which occur in the prefrontal and prefrontal lobe-motor pathways. As far as we know, there is no systematic review of neuroimaging technologies related to spatial navigation functions. In order to fill this gap, in this review, we combine the structure and function of brain imaging and multimodal imaging technology and summarize the central brain regions and brain imaging features related to spatial navigation function. It provides a new method for selecting and dialing the spatial navigation ability of specific populations and a new idea for diagnosing clinical spatial navigation dysfunction.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Research Progress of Space Navigation Capability Based on Image Technology
    AU  - Huihui Wang
    AU  - Linjing Zhang
    AU  - Liyi Chi
    AU  - Yanhai Zhang
    AU  - Linli Chang
    AU  - Wanqi Bai
    Y1  - 2022/12/23
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20221106.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.cmr.20221106.15
    T2  - Clinical Medicine Research
    JF  - Clinical Medicine Research
    JO  - Clinical Medicine Research
    SP  - 178
    EP  - 182
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-9057
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20221106.15
    AB  - Spatial navigation ability refers to the complex process of the human body building cognitive maps in the brain according to the external environment. It is crucial to study spatial navigation ability to understand human cognitive functions. With the advent of advanced neuroimaging technologies, such as positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, more and more evidence indicates that differences in the navigation ability of empty individuals are related to differences in brain structure and function. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DTI) are two common methods of functional imaging and structural imaging. fMRI mimics animal experiments by measuring changes in signals related to blood oxygen levels in different regions of the brain, solving a major problem in human studies. On the other hand, structural connections are stable for short periods and are more suitable for studying differences in a single spatial navigation network without uniform training. Structural networks can be evaluated by DTI. DTI is highly sensitive to the Brownian motion of water molecules in voxels, especially in white matter. DTI results suggested that etiology is associated with disrupted fiber connections and decreased FA values, both of which occur in the prefrontal and prefrontal lobe-motor pathways. As far as we know, there is no systematic review of neuroimaging technologies related to spatial navigation functions. In order to fill this gap, in this review, we combine the structure and function of brain imaging and multimodal imaging technology and summarize the central brain regions and brain imaging features related to spatial navigation function. It provides a new method for selecting and dialing the spatial navigation ability of specific populations and a new idea for diagnosing clinical spatial navigation dysfunction.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Neurology, Chinese People's Liberation Army 986th Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China

  • Department of Scientific Research, Chinese People's Liberation Army 986th Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China

  • Department of Neurology, Chinese People's Liberation Army 986th Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China

  • The First Outpatient Department, Chinese People's Liberation Army 986th Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China

  • Department of Neurology, Chinese People's Liberation Army 986th Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China

  • Department of Neurology, Chinese People's Liberation Army 986th Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China

  • Sections