Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate and evaluate the changes of incisor inclination and arch width in the surgical-orthodontic treatment to correct a Class Ⅲ malocclusion resulting from skeletal mandibular prognathism. Materials and methods: The skeletal mandibular prognathism subjects consisted of 25 males and 20 females (mean age:22.8±4.2years). A lateral cephalogram was taken for each subject before preoperative orthodontic treatment (T1), presurgical (T2), and at completion of the postoperative orthodontic treatment (T3). Skeletal and dental values and arch width measurements at T1, T2 and T3 were obtained. Each cephalogram was traced and digitized twice. For statistical evaluation, all the data were expressed as Mean±Standard deviation and analyzed with SPSS software. Results: At pretreatment, dental compensation was normally found in both dental arches, including anterior and posterior teeth. During presurgical orthodontic treatment, most of the patient’s mandibular incisors were significantly decompensated (P<0.05), while no significant changes were noted in the maxillary incisors (P ≥ 0.05). The increase in maxillary inter-first molar width were statistically significant (P<0.05). With effective dental decompensation, the relationship between teeth and basal bone was improved obviously. It is beneficial for moving bone bulk in surgery. After the surgery, most of the patients (97.8%) finished with proper overjet and overbite, establish stable and harmony occlusion. Conclusion: By effective and proper dental decompensation, desired teeth positions could be achieved before surgery, which could lead to better surgical results.
| Published in | Clinical Medicine Research (Volume 3, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.cmr.20140306.15 |
| Page(s) | 181-188 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Dental Decompensation, Skeletal Madibular Prognathism, Orthognathic Surgery, Class Ⅲ Malocclusion, Harmony Occlusion
| [1] | Kelsey CC. Radiographic cephalometric study of surgically corrected mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg 1968; 26: 239-48. |
| [2] | Rabie AB, Wong RW, Min GU. Treatment in Borderline Class III Malocclusion: Orthodontic Camouflage (Extraction) Versus Orthognathic Surgery. Open Dent J 2008; 2: 38-48. |
| [3] | Johnston C, Burden D, Kennedy D, Harradine N, Stevenson M. Class III surgical-orthodontic treatment: A cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130: 300-309. |
| [4] | Troy BA, Shanker S, Fields HW, Vig K, Johnston W. Comparison of incisor inclination in patients with Class III malocclusion treated with orthognathic surgery or orthodontic camouflage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 146e1-146e9. |
| [5] | Solow B. The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications. Br J Orthod 1980; 7: 145-161. |
| [6] | Reitzik M. Cephalometry in the surgical correction of prognathism. Br J Oral Surg 1972; 10: 1-11. |
| [7] | Ning F, Duan YZ, Huo N. Camouflage treatment in skeletal Class III cases combined with severe crowding by extraction of four premolars. Orthod Waves 2009; 68: 80-87. |
| [8] | Aksu M, Kocadereli I. Arch Width Changes in Extraction and Nonextraction Treatment in Class I Patients. Angle Orthodontist 2005; 75: 948-952. |
| [9] | Ning F, Duan YZ. Camouflage treatment in adult skeletal Class III cases by extraction of two lower premolars. Korean J Orthod 2010; 40: 349-357. |
| [10] | Bell WH, Jacobs JD. Tridimensional planning for surgical orthodontic treatment of mandibular excess. Am J Orthod 1981; 80: 263-288. |
| [11] | Litton SF, Ackermann LV, Isaacson RJ. A genetic study of Class Ⅲ malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1970; 58: 565-577. |
| [12] | Lee YS, Lee SJ, An H, Donatelli RE, Kim SH. Do Class III patients have a different growth spurt than the general population? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142: 679-89. |
| [13] | Alling CC. Orthognathic surgery: mandibular prognathism. J Ala Dent Assoc 1983; 67: 26-29, 32-35. |
| [14] | Jacobson A, Evans WG, Preston CB. Mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 1974; 66: 140-171. |
| [15] | Chen CM, Lee HE, Yang CF. Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: long-term stability. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 61: 52-55. |
| [16] | Capelozza FL, Martins A, Mazzotini R. Effects of dental decompensation on the surgical treatment of mandibular prognathism. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1996; 11: 165-180. |
| [17] | Bjork A. Some biological aspects of prognathism and occlusion of the teeth. Acta Odontal Scand 1950; 9: 1-40. |
| [18] | Pascoe JJ, Haywars JR, Costich ER. Mandibular prognathism: its etiology and a classification. J Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv 1960; 18: 21-24. |
| [19] | Rakosi T, Schilli W. Class Ⅲ anomalies: a coordinated approach to skeletal, dental and soft tissue problems. J Oral Surg 1981; 39: 860-870. |
| [20] | Isaacon JR, Isaacon RJ, Speidel TM. Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variation in skeletal and dental relations. Angle Orthod 1971; 41: 219-229. |
| [21] | Lehman JA Jr, Tabbal N, Haas DG. The combined surgical and orthodontic treatment of mandibular prognathism. Ann Plast Surg 1981; 7: 458-463. |
| [22] | Vasir NS, Thompson RT, Davies TM. Dental and skeletal changes following sagittal split ostotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism. Eur J Orthod 1991; 13: 134-142. |
| [23] | Zhou Y, Hu W, Fu M. Pre-and post surgical orthodontic treatment of mandibular prognathism. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 1999; 34: 357-360. |
| [24] | Mobarak KA, Krogstad O, Espeland L, Lyberg T. Long-term stability of mandibular setback surgery: a follow-up of 80 bilateral sagittal split osteotomy patients. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 2000; 15: 83–95. |
| [25] | Cho HJ. Long-Term Stability of Surgical Mandibular Setback. Angle Orthodontist 2007; 77: 851-856. |
APA Style
Fang Ning, Yinzhong Duan, Yi Xue, Donghui Yuan. (2014). Incisor Inclination and Arch Width Changes Following Mandibular Setback Surgery for Correction of Mandibular Prognathism. Clinical Medicine Research, 3(6), 181-188. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20140306.15
ACS Style
Fang Ning; Yinzhong Duan; Yi Xue; Donghui Yuan. Incisor Inclination and Arch Width Changes Following Mandibular Setback Surgery for Correction of Mandibular Prognathism. Clin. Med. Res. 2014, 3(6), 181-188. doi: 10.11648/j.cmr.20140306.15
AMA Style
Fang Ning, Yinzhong Duan, Yi Xue, Donghui Yuan. Incisor Inclination and Arch Width Changes Following Mandibular Setback Surgery for Correction of Mandibular Prognathism. Clin Med Res. 2014;3(6):181-188. doi: 10.11648/j.cmr.20140306.15
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.cmr.20140306.15,
author = {Fang Ning and Yinzhong Duan and Yi Xue and Donghui Yuan},
title = {Incisor Inclination and Arch Width Changes Following Mandibular Setback Surgery for Correction of Mandibular Prognathism},
journal = {Clinical Medicine Research},
volume = {3},
number = {6},
pages = {181-188},
doi = {10.11648/j.cmr.20140306.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20140306.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cmr.20140306.15},
abstract = {Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate and evaluate the changes of incisor inclination and arch width in the surgical-orthodontic treatment to correct a Class Ⅲ malocclusion resulting from skeletal mandibular prognathism. Materials and methods: The skeletal mandibular prognathism subjects consisted of 25 males and 20 females (mean age:22.8±4.2years). A lateral cephalogram was taken for each subject before preoperative orthodontic treatment (T1), presurgical (T2), and at completion of the postoperative orthodontic treatment (T3). Skeletal and dental values and arch width measurements at T1, T2 and T3 were obtained. Each cephalogram was traced and digitized twice. For statistical evaluation, all the data were expressed as Mean±Standard deviation and analyzed with SPSS software. Results: At pretreatment, dental compensation was normally found in both dental arches, including anterior and posterior teeth. During presurgical orthodontic treatment, most of the patient’s mandibular incisors were significantly decompensated (P<0.05), while no significant changes were noted in the maxillary incisors (P ≥ 0.05). The increase in maxillary inter-first molar width were statistically significant (P<0.05). With effective dental decompensation, the relationship between teeth and basal bone was improved obviously. It is beneficial for moving bone bulk in surgery. After the surgery, most of the patients (97.8%) finished with proper overjet and overbite, establish stable and harmony occlusion. Conclusion: By effective and proper dental decompensation, desired teeth positions could be achieved before surgery, which could lead to better surgical results.},
year = {2014}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Incisor Inclination and Arch Width Changes Following Mandibular Setback Surgery for Correction of Mandibular Prognathism AU - Fang Ning AU - Yinzhong Duan AU - Yi Xue AU - Donghui Yuan Y1 - 2014/12/02 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20140306.15 DO - 10.11648/j.cmr.20140306.15 T2 - Clinical Medicine Research JF - Clinical Medicine Research JO - Clinical Medicine Research SP - 181 EP - 188 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-9057 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20140306.15 AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate and evaluate the changes of incisor inclination and arch width in the surgical-orthodontic treatment to correct a Class Ⅲ malocclusion resulting from skeletal mandibular prognathism. Materials and methods: The skeletal mandibular prognathism subjects consisted of 25 males and 20 females (mean age:22.8±4.2years). A lateral cephalogram was taken for each subject before preoperative orthodontic treatment (T1), presurgical (T2), and at completion of the postoperative orthodontic treatment (T3). Skeletal and dental values and arch width measurements at T1, T2 and T3 were obtained. Each cephalogram was traced and digitized twice. For statistical evaluation, all the data were expressed as Mean±Standard deviation and analyzed with SPSS software. Results: At pretreatment, dental compensation was normally found in both dental arches, including anterior and posterior teeth. During presurgical orthodontic treatment, most of the patient’s mandibular incisors were significantly decompensated (P<0.05), while no significant changes were noted in the maxillary incisors (P ≥ 0.05). The increase in maxillary inter-first molar width were statistically significant (P<0.05). With effective dental decompensation, the relationship between teeth and basal bone was improved obviously. It is beneficial for moving bone bulk in surgery. After the surgery, most of the patients (97.8%) finished with proper overjet and overbite, establish stable and harmony occlusion. Conclusion: By effective and proper dental decompensation, desired teeth positions could be achieved before surgery, which could lead to better surgical results. VL - 3 IS - 6 ER -
Email: