| Peer-Reviewed

Effects of Different Irrigation Levels with Bio-stimulant Applications on Plant Growth in ‘Kabarla’ Strawberry Variety

Received: 2 July 2017     Accepted: 17 July 2017     Published: 11 August 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In this study, the effects of different irrigation levels with bio-stimulant applications on leaf area, crown diameter, number of crown, leaf number and plant width were investigated in a variety of Kabarla. The trail was implemented as a 4×2 factorial scheme (irrigation levels and bio-stimulant use), in split plot design with 6 consequent months at 4 replicates, totaling 32 plots. Bio-stimulant applications were designed as main plot and different irrigation levels were arranged as sub plot. Strawberry plant was subjected to four irrigation water levels (Ir125, 1.25 Ep; Ir100, 1.0 Ep; Ir75, 0.75 Ep; Ir50, 0.50 Ep). Bio-stimulant applications were investigated on morphological parameters with compared by control plot. As a result of the experiment, irrigation levels and growing period influenced the leaf area, crown diameter, plant width, number of crown and leaf number. Bio-stimulant application just positively affected the number of leaf, while other parameters were not affected by the application. All examined parameters were taken same statistical group except of IR50 which negatively affected plant growth. Also as expected, all plant vegetative part increased with time and this increase was determined statistically significant among months. As a result of these data, IR75 irrigation level could be recommended in terms of optimal vegetative growing combined with bio-stimulant applications.

Published in American Journal of Plant Biology (Volume 2, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajpb.20170204.11
Page(s) 120-124
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Drought Stress, High Tunnel, Class A pan, Leaf Area, Crown Diameter

References
[1] A. Nezhadahmadı, G. Faruq, and K. Rashıd, “Influence of Drought Stress on Leaf Traits of Different Strawberry (Fragaria ananassa L.) Varieties in Natural Environment”, Doı: 10.1080/00103624.2015.1033536, 2015.
[2] B. Z. Yuan, J. Sun, and S. Nishiyama, “Effect of drip irrigation on strawberrygrowth and yield inside a plastic greenhouse”, Biosyst. Eng. 87, 237–245, 2004.
[3] C. M. Grijalba, M. M. P. Trujillo, D. Ruiz, and A. M. Ferrucho, “Strawberry yields with high tunnel and open field cultivations and the relationship with vegetative and reproductive plant characteristics”, Agronomia Colombiana 33 (2), 147-154, 2015.
[4] D. Battacharyya, M. Z. Badgohari, P. Rathor, and B. Prithiviraj, “Seaweed extracts as biostimulants in horticulture”, Scientia Horticulturae 196, 39-48, 2015.
[5] D. Lozano, N. Ruiz, and P. Gavilan, “Consumptive water use and irrigation performance of strawberries. Agricultural water management”, 169, 44-51, 2016.
[6] D. Waterer, and J. Bantle, “High tunnel temperature observations”, http://www.usask.ca/agriculture/plantsci/vegetable/resources/veg/ht_temp.pdf; (accessed: February, Powell, M., Cowan, J., Miles, C., Inglis, D. A., 2013. Effect of a high tunnel, organic cropping system on lettuce diseases in western Washington. Online. Plant Health Progress doi: 10.1094/PHP-2013-0922-01-RS. 2017), 2000.
[7] E. Krüger, G. Schmidt, and U. Brückner, “Scheduling strawberry irrigation based upon tensiometer measurement and a climatic water balance model”, Sci. Hortic. 81, 409–424, 1999.
[8] E. Kunicki, A. Grabowska, A. Sekara, and R. Wojciechowska, “The effect of cultivar type, time of cultivation, and biostimulant treatment on the yield of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”, Folia Hortic. 22: 9–13, 2010.
[9] FAO, “Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations”, 2017. FAOSTAT. http://faostat.fao.org/. accessed: 19/03/2017.
[10] F. Liu, S. Savic, C. R. Jensen, A. Shahnazari, S. E. Jacobsen, R. Stikic, and M. N. Andersen, “Water relations and yield of lysimeter-grown strawberries under limited irrigation”, Scientia Horticulturae 111, 128–132, 2007.
[11] J. Ferrato, A. Muguiro, F. Tineo, R. Grasso, A. Longo, M. C. Mondino, L. Carrancio, and V. Duarte, “Experiencias sobre nuevas tecnologías hortícolas en cultivos bajo cubierta. Ministerio de Educación, Ciencias y Tecnología; Instituto Nacional de Educación Tecnológica, Buenos Aires”, 2003.
[12] J. S. Boyer, “Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybean, and sunflower at various leaf water potentials”, Plant Physiol. 46: 233-235, 1970.
[13] K. Klamkowski, and W. Treder, “Response to drought stress of three strawberry cultivars grown under greenhouse conditions”, Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research 16, 179–188, 2008.
[14] L. L. Strand, “Integrated Pest Management for Strawberries”, vol. 3351. UCANR Publications, 2008.
[15] L. Serrano, X. Carbonell, R. Save, O. Marfà, and J. Penuelas, “Effects of irrigation regimes on the yield and water use of strawberry”, Irrig. Sci. 13, 45–48, 1992.
[16] M. Dingil, E. Öztekin, E. Akça, and S. Şenol, "Updating Soil Characteristics Of the Çukurova Region (Southern Turkey) Using Geographical Information Systems and Ilsen Software.", Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, no. 4, pp. 316-320, 2010.
[17] N. Ghaderi, S. Normohammadi, and T. Javadi, “Morpho-physiological responses of strawberry (Fragariaxananassa) to exogenous salicylic acid application under drought stress”, J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 17: 167-178, 2015.
[18] O. M. Grant, A. W. Johnson, M. J. Davies, C. M. James, and D. W. Simpson, “Physiological and morphological diversity of cultivated strawberry (Fragaria×ananassa) in response to water deficit”, Environmental and Experimental Botany 68, 264–272, 2010.
[19] O. M. Grant, M. J. Davies, A. W. Johnson, and D. W. Simpson, “Physiological and growth responses to water deficits in cultivated strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) and in one of its progenitors, Fragaria chiloensis”, Environ. Exp. Bot. 83, 23-32. Doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.04.004, 2012.
[20] P. Vernieri, A. Ferrante, E. Borghesi, and G. Magnani, “High quality flowering plants using the biostimulants”, L’Informatore Agrario. 16: 57–60. [In Italian], 2005.
[21] R. Bulgari, G. Cocetta, A. Trivellini, and P. Vernieri & A. Ferrante, “Biostimulants and crop responses: a review, Biological Agriculture & Horticulture”, 31: 1, 1-17, DOI: 10.1080/01448765.2014.964649, 2015.
[22] R. Kanber, M. Eylen, and A. Tok, “The yield of strawberry under drip and furrow irrigation in Cukurova region of Turkey. The report of Agriculture, Forestry and Village Affairs Ministry”, 135 (77), 39. (In Turkish), 1986.
[23] R. Kanber, “Irrigation”, The publication of Cukurova University, Agricultural Faculty. 174 (A-52). P 530. (In Turkish), 2006.
[24] S. Kumar, and P. Dey, “Effect of different mulches and irrigation methods on root growth, nutrient uptake, water use efficiency and yield of strawberry”, Sci Hort. 127 (3): 318-324, 2011.
[25] T. C. Hsiao, “Plant responses to water stress. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol”, 24: 519-570, 1973.
[26] T. J. Trout, and J. Gartung, “Irrigation water requirements of strawberries. ActaHortic”, (ISHS) 664, 665–671, 2004.
[27] TUIK, Agricultural data. Turkish sttatistical institute. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1001 (accessed: february, 2017), 2017.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Burcak Kapur, Eser Celiktopuz, Mehmet Ali Saridas, Sevgi Paydas Kargi. (2017). Effects of Different Irrigation Levels with Bio-stimulant Applications on Plant Growth in ‘Kabarla’ Strawberry Variety. American Journal of Plant Biology, 2(4), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20170204.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Burcak Kapur; Eser Celiktopuz; Mehmet Ali Saridas; Sevgi Paydas Kargi. Effects of Different Irrigation Levels with Bio-stimulant Applications on Plant Growth in ‘Kabarla’ Strawberry Variety. Am. J. Plant Biol. 2017, 2(4), 120-124. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20170204.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Burcak Kapur, Eser Celiktopuz, Mehmet Ali Saridas, Sevgi Paydas Kargi. Effects of Different Irrigation Levels with Bio-stimulant Applications on Plant Growth in ‘Kabarla’ Strawberry Variety. Am J Plant Biol. 2017;2(4):120-124. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20170204.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajpb.20170204.11,
      author = {Burcak Kapur and Eser Celiktopuz and Mehmet Ali Saridas and Sevgi Paydas Kargi},
      title = {Effects of Different Irrigation Levels with Bio-stimulant Applications on Plant Growth in ‘Kabarla’ Strawberry Variety},
      journal = {American Journal of Plant Biology},
      volume = {2},
      number = {4},
      pages = {120-124},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajpb.20170204.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20170204.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpb.20170204.11},
      abstract = {In this study, the effects of different irrigation levels with bio-stimulant applications on leaf area, crown diameter, number of crown, leaf number and plant width were investigated in a variety of Kabarla. The trail was implemented as a 4×2 factorial scheme (irrigation levels and bio-stimulant use), in split plot design with 6 consequent months at 4 replicates, totaling 32 plots. Bio-stimulant applications were designed as main plot and different irrigation levels were arranged as sub plot. Strawberry plant was subjected to four irrigation water levels (Ir125, 1.25 Ep; Ir100, 1.0 Ep; Ir75, 0.75 Ep; Ir50, 0.50 Ep). Bio-stimulant applications were investigated on morphological parameters with compared by control plot. As a result of the experiment, irrigation levels and growing period influenced the leaf area, crown diameter, plant width, number of crown and leaf number. Bio-stimulant application just positively affected the number of leaf, while other parameters were not affected by the application. All examined parameters were taken same statistical group except of IR50 which negatively affected plant growth. Also as expected, all plant vegetative part increased with time and this increase was determined statistically significant among months. As a result of these data, IR75 irrigation level could be recommended in terms of optimal vegetative growing combined with bio-stimulant applications.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effects of Different Irrigation Levels with Bio-stimulant Applications on Plant Growth in ‘Kabarla’ Strawberry Variety
    AU  - Burcak Kapur
    AU  - Eser Celiktopuz
    AU  - Mehmet Ali Saridas
    AU  - Sevgi Paydas Kargi
    Y1  - 2017/08/11
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20170204.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajpb.20170204.11
    T2  - American Journal of Plant Biology
    JF  - American Journal of Plant Biology
    JO  - American Journal of Plant Biology
    SP  - 120
    EP  - 124
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-8337
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20170204.11
    AB  - In this study, the effects of different irrigation levels with bio-stimulant applications on leaf area, crown diameter, number of crown, leaf number and plant width were investigated in a variety of Kabarla. The trail was implemented as a 4×2 factorial scheme (irrigation levels and bio-stimulant use), in split plot design with 6 consequent months at 4 replicates, totaling 32 plots. Bio-stimulant applications were designed as main plot and different irrigation levels were arranged as sub plot. Strawberry plant was subjected to four irrigation water levels (Ir125, 1.25 Ep; Ir100, 1.0 Ep; Ir75, 0.75 Ep; Ir50, 0.50 Ep). Bio-stimulant applications were investigated on morphological parameters with compared by control plot. As a result of the experiment, irrigation levels and growing period influenced the leaf area, crown diameter, plant width, number of crown and leaf number. Bio-stimulant application just positively affected the number of leaf, while other parameters were not affected by the application. All examined parameters were taken same statistical group except of IR50 which negatively affected plant growth. Also as expected, all plant vegetative part increased with time and this increase was determined statistically significant among months. As a result of these data, IR75 irrigation level could be recommended in terms of optimal vegetative growing combined with bio-stimulant applications.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation Engineering, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey

  • Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation Engineering, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey

  • Department of Horticulture Science, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey

  • Department of Horticulture Science, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey

  • Sections