Learning a language is learning how to communicate in culturally, socially and academically in appropriate ways consistent with the norms and customs of the target language users. Cooperative learning as a technique used by teachers can assist students in improving essential social skills. This study aimed to investigate the effect of STAD technique on learning idioms of low-intermediate EFL learners. In addition, it aimed to compare the idiom learning of male and female language learners based on STAD. Sixty low-intermediate language learners were selected from No’andishan language institutes in Sari. Oxford Placement Test and the idiom learning package test were used in this study. Results showed that there was a significant difference between the mean scores of the two groups on the posttest of the idiom. The STAD group performed better on the post-test of idiom. No significant difference between the mean scores of the males and females on the posttest of the idiom was found.
Published in | Science Journal of Education (Volume 3, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sjedu.20150302.13 |
Page(s) | 30-36 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cooperative learning, idiom learning, social skill, STAD
[1] | Ambrose, J. (2000). Why idioms are important for English language learners? Retrieved March 25, 2014, from lib.chdu.edu.ua/pdf/zbirnuku/7/37.pdf. |
[2] | Bejarano, Y. (1987). A cooperative small-group methodology in the languageclassroom. TESOL Quarterly, 21 (3), 483-504. |
[3] | Cheng, K. (2006). Does cooperative learning enhance the residual effects of student interpersonal relationship skills? A case study at a Taiwan Technical College. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 10(1), 312-316. |
[4] | Ghaith, G. M. (2003). Effects of the learning together model of cooperative learning on EFL reading achievement, academic self-esteem, and feelings of school alienation. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3), 65-79. |
[5] | Gillett, A. (2004). Speak English like an American. Learn the idioms and expressions that will help you speak like a native. NY: Language Success Press. |
[6] | Hamidi, H., & Montazeri, M. (2014). Dictionary of second language acquisition. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://www.iranelt.com/index.php/introduction-to-sla. |
[7] | Harmer, J. (2001).The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.). UK: Pearson Education Limited. |
[8] | Jalilifar, A. (2010). The effect of cooperative learning techniques on college students' reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 96-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.009. |
[9] | Johnson, W., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1995). Cooperative Learning and Individual Achievement in Secondary Schools. In J. F. Pedersen & A. D. Digby, (Eds.), Secondary schools and cooperative learning: Theories, models and strategies (pp. 3-54). New York: Garland Publishing Inc. |
[10] | Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38 (2), 67-73. |
[11] | Johnson, D. W.& Johnson, R.(2005) New Development in social Interdependence Theory. Genetic, Social, &General Psychology Monographs, 131(4), 285-296. |
[12] | Lia, Y. (2002). A study of Taiwanese junior high school students’ EFL learning motivation and learning strategies. Masters’ thesis: National Changhua University of Education. |
[13] | McArdle, G. (2005). The free rider and cooperative learning groups: perspectives from faculty members. Lendi Nova Southeastern University. ERIC #: (ED 492459). |
[14] | Momtaz, E., & Garner, M. (2010). Does collaborative learning improve EFL learners‟ reading comprehension? Journal of linguistics and language teaching, 1(1), 15-36. |
[15] | Panitz, T. (1997).Collaborative versus cooperative learning: A comparison of the two concepts which will help us understand the underlying nature of interactive learning. Retrieved March 20, 2014, from http://home.capecod.net/~tpanitz/tedsarticles/coopdefinition.htm. |
[16] | Rahimi, A., &Tahmasebi, S. (2010). Mediating Iranian EFL Learners: Private speech and scaffolding in reading comprehension. Linguistic & Literary Broad Research and Innovation, 1(2), 56-71. |
[17] | Rivers, W. M. (1981).Teaching foreign language skills (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
[18] | Slavin, R. E. (1987).Cooperative learning and the cooperative school. Educational Leadership, 45 (3), 7-13. |
[19] | Slavin R. E. 1(994). Outcome-based education is not mastery learning. Educational Leadership, 51 (6), 14-22. |
[20] | Slavin, R. E. (1995).Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. NJ: Prentice Hall. |
[21] | Slavin, R. E. (1999). Comprehensive approaches to cooperative learning. Theory into Practice, 38 (2), 74-79. |
[22] | Slavin, R. E. (2011).Instruction based on cooperative learning. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp.344-360). New York: Taylor & Francis. |
[23] | Tran, V. D., & Lewis, R. (2012). Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students at AnGiang University in Vietnam. International Education Studies, 5(1), 86- 99. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n1p86 |
[24] | Yu, E. (1995). Successful cooperation in EFL teaching: A classroom study in writing. Proceedings of the 14th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the R.O.C. 253-72. Taipei: Crane. |
[25] | Zakaria, E., Chin, C.L., & Daud.Y.(2010). The effect of cooperative learning on students mathematics achievements and attitude towards mathematics. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 272-275. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.272.275 |
APA Style
Shokoufeh Safari, Shaban Berimani. (2015). The Effect of STAD Technique on the Idiom Learning of Low-Intermediate Institute Language Learners. Science Journal of Education, 3(2), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20150302.13
ACS Style
Shokoufeh Safari; Shaban Berimani. The Effect of STAD Technique on the Idiom Learning of Low-Intermediate Institute Language Learners. Sci. J. Educ. 2015, 3(2), 30-36. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20150302.13
AMA Style
Shokoufeh Safari, Shaban Berimani. The Effect of STAD Technique on the Idiom Learning of Low-Intermediate Institute Language Learners. Sci J Educ. 2015;3(2):30-36. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20150302.13
@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20150302.13, author = {Shokoufeh Safari and Shaban Berimani}, title = {The Effect of STAD Technique on the Idiom Learning of Low-Intermediate Institute Language Learners}, journal = {Science Journal of Education}, volume = {3}, number = {2}, pages = {30-36}, doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20150302.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20150302.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20150302.13}, abstract = {Learning a language is learning how to communicate in culturally, socially and academically in appropriate ways consistent with the norms and customs of the target language users. Cooperative learning as a technique used by teachers can assist students in improving essential social skills. This study aimed to investigate the effect of STAD technique on learning idioms of low-intermediate EFL learners. In addition, it aimed to compare the idiom learning of male and female language learners based on STAD. Sixty low-intermediate language learners were selected from No’andishan language institutes in Sari. Oxford Placement Test and the idiom learning package test were used in this study. Results showed that there was a significant difference between the mean scores of the two groups on the posttest of the idiom. The STAD group performed better on the post-test of idiom. No significant difference between the mean scores of the males and females on the posttest of the idiom was found.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Effect of STAD Technique on the Idiom Learning of Low-Intermediate Institute Language Learners AU - Shokoufeh Safari AU - Shaban Berimani Y1 - 2015/03/24 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20150302.13 DO - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20150302.13 T2 - Science Journal of Education JF - Science Journal of Education JO - Science Journal of Education SP - 30 EP - 36 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-0897 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20150302.13 AB - Learning a language is learning how to communicate in culturally, socially and academically in appropriate ways consistent with the norms and customs of the target language users. Cooperative learning as a technique used by teachers can assist students in improving essential social skills. This study aimed to investigate the effect of STAD technique on learning idioms of low-intermediate EFL learners. In addition, it aimed to compare the idiom learning of male and female language learners based on STAD. Sixty low-intermediate language learners were selected from No’andishan language institutes in Sari. Oxford Placement Test and the idiom learning package test were used in this study. Results showed that there was a significant difference between the mean scores of the two groups on the posttest of the idiom. The STAD group performed better on the post-test of idiom. No significant difference between the mean scores of the males and females on the posttest of the idiom was found. VL - 3 IS - 2 ER -